@jim_dhr wrote:

So, now the Trek brand is tainted, I am happy to say anyone wanting to get rid of said TREK frames in part ex will glady be offered the full market value of a fiver (If you are including the fork of course).

Keep waving the wand for justice Claire..................

Jim

Wind-up merchant!! 😆

Hahahahahahahahaha very funny!

@jim_dhr wrote:

So, now the Trek brand is tainted, I am happy to say anyone wanting to get rid of said TREK frames in part ex will glady be offered the full market value of a fiver (If you are including the fork of course).

Keep waving the wand for justice Claire..................

Jim

I'm afraid I don't understand your post - could you please explain.

@Jed wrote:

@jim_dhr wrote:

So, now the Trek brand is tainted, I am happy to say anyone wanting to get rid of said TREK frames in part ex will glady be offered the full market value of a fiver (If you are including the fork of course).

Keep waving the wand for justice Claire..................

Jim

I'm afraid I don't understand your post - could you please explain.

Hi Jed,

I think Jim might-just-be-referring-to our own Claire - see: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1365 and digest a more comprehensive investigation that UCI/WADA/USADA/IOC put together!! 🙂

Thanks Ady.

I am sorry to say that so far we have had no takers from the Weaver Valley for my more than generous part ex offer for the now shady Trek brand frames. I have had a couple in from the more general public. In fact Dave is considering fixing 2 of said frames to the end of his drive as a set of ornamental gates...........

I promised a club member at the dinner - in exchange for a jug of cream - that I would give it a rest on the club website, lol! So I will have to pop into the Dave Hinde bike shop if I want a rant and cup of tea! 🙂

P.S. The jug of cream sounded like a good deal at the time.....!